Blog

Submitted by Timothy J. Keating, Keating Investments, LLC

In November 2009, we published a white paper on the endowment model of investing (The Yale Endowment Model of Investing is Not Dead) that argued that the melt down at certain endowments had nothing to do with purported flaws in modern portfolio theory.  Now that the financial crisis has receded, we thought it would be instructive to take a fresh look at some of these same endowments to see what lessons they learned and what, if any, changes they made to the constructions of their portfolio.

Download the PDF

Submitted by Margie L. Blackwell, Keating Investments, LLC

During the summer, Keating Investments published a set of three inter-related white papers that address in detail many of the critical questions that small private companies face when considering going public.  You may download a copy of each of these white papers from our Blog page.

Submitted by Rick Schweiger, Keating Investments, LLC

A structurally compromised IPO market has prevented many deserving companies from going public and enjoying the many benefits associated with having public company status, such as higher valuations, superior access to capital and a stock currency for acquisitions.  It needn’t be this way.  For public-ready companies, there is an alternative to the traditional IPO that is not fraught with the uncertainty that by definition characterizes a firm commitment initial public offering.  That alternative is a so-called “direct listing.”  Unlike the IPO, which combines a public offering and an exchange listing in a single step, the direct listing separates the going public process into two discrete steps – an exchange listing and a subsequent follow-on or alternative registered offering.  The direct listing process provides a relatively quick, certain and cost effective way to get access to these capital raising options – all of which can be completed using what is known as a shelf registration – where shares are SEC registered in advance and then sold “off the shelf” when market conditions are most favorable.  This white paper explains what a direct listing is, how it works, why it should be considered as an IPO alternative, and what capital raising options are available to exchange-listed companies, including and especially those companies that go public through a direct listing.

Download the PDF

Submitted by Timothy J. Keating, Keating Investments, LLC

Public companies can enjoy many benefits, particularly significantly higher valuations and superior access to capital, compared to privately owned businesses.  These benefits are conditional on the existence of a “liquid” market for the company’s shares.  Illiquidity can prevent the stock of a smaller public issuer from achieving the higher valuations enjoyed by its peers, thereby negating one of the primary benefits of being public.  The goal of any publicly traded company, therefore, should be to have its stock become widely held, actively traded, fully valued, and covered by at least one research analyst.  But what exactly do these things mean? This white paper creates a framework for objectively defining and quantifying these terms and outlines a path to the holy grail of liquidity.

Download the PDF

Submitted by Timothy J. Keating, Keating Investments, LLC

Entrepreneurs seeking capital to monetize and maximize their enterprise values have always faced a pivotal choice:  either sell out or go public.  Once upon a time in America, the default choice for a venture capitalist or entrepreneur worth his salt was easy:  go for the IPO.  In the last decade or so, however, the table has turned and the IPO has now become the exception rather than the rule.  This choice has profoundly adverse implications for American jobs, growth and ultimately competitiveness.  The stakes couldn’t be higher.  This white paper will argue that the benefits of going public—especially for smaller companies—vastly outweigh the costs and can represent as much as $100 million or more in lost value for a small company.

Download the PDF

Read the rest of this entry »

By Timothy J. Keating

For many years, the Ivy League has been known for its traditions, its gothic buildings, and, until recently, the mystique of its mammoth-sized endowments that consistently generated incredibly high returns in bull and bear markets alike. Ivy League and other large endowments, weighing in at billions of dollars, were able to achieve these extraordinary results by following what is often called the “Yale Model” for endowments developed by Yale University’s Chief Investment Officer, David Swensen, under which they invested heavily in alternatives such as private equity and hedge funds.  Until very recently, it seemed to some that the Yale Model was invincible.

Download the PDF

Read the rest of this entry »

By Timothy J. Keating

Shortly after the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 was implemented, it suddenly became very unfashionable to be public—particularly for smaller companies.  Out went the emerging growth underwriters of the 1990s (Montgomery, Robertson Stephens, Hambrecht & Quist, to name a few), and in came the leveraged buyout artists to take companies to the promised land of being private…before going public again.  So now that enough time has passed, how has it all worked out?  That depends.  If you were a private company or a limited partner in a private equity fund, the track record has been mixed, at best.  If, however, you were a private equity sponsor, chances are that in the era of cheap money that recently ended (and by charging fees for every activity imaginable) you probably did pretty well.

Download the PDF

Read the rest of this entry »

By Timothy J. Keating

Traditionally, investors have focused on portfolios consisting of the three primary asset classes: stocks, bonds and cash. Many financial models often recommend allocations to non-traditional asset classes and strategies that have a low correlation to the market. Although a number of these strategies failed to deliver under the extreme stress test of 2008, alpha can still be found in a number of strategies. As investors prepare to reposition their portfolios, absolute return strategies with genuine sources of alpha should be part of the equation. But investors and advisers seeking this alpha should be careful to only select strategies that are easy to understand, are capable of generating absolute returns without the benefit of leverage, provide diversification and low correlation to the stock market, are transparent and, if at all possible, are packaged in the form of liquid investments.

Download the PDF

Read the rest of this entry »